What is the purpose of the line of discussion? In what universe is the sexual orientation of any judge relevant to ANY case?
Should straight judges recuse themselves from a case involving sexual orientation? What about religious conflict of interest – is that on the table now as well?
It’s yet another example of how the the MSM shouldn’t assail the journalistic chops of new media when asinine matters like this come up.
Pam’s House Blend – Front Page
