The Republican primary included non-binding propositions. In a proposition on whether or not there should be a public use of God, the results were 95 percent in favor.vzlom-alawarпродвижение сайта в соцсетях
2 Comments
Carl Smith
on March 3, 2010 at 12:11 am
The proposition was not on the “public use of God” but on the public use of the word God. The prop read: The use of the word “God”, prayers, and the Ten Commandments should be allowed at public gatherings and public educational institutions, as well as be permitted on government buildings and property.
I think the key here is “should be allowed”, not mandatory.
Doesn’t really matter. It’s non-binding on anyone.
The proposition was not on the “public use of God” but on the public use of the word God. The prop read: The use of the word “God”, prayers, and the Ten Commandments should be allowed at public gatherings and public educational institutions, as well as be permitted on government buildings and property.
I think the key here is “should be allowed”, not mandatory.
Doesn’t really matter. It’s non-binding on anyone.
You’d think God, in Her omnipotence, could get 100 percent of the Republicans. This is why atheism makes a lot more sense.