At the Miss USA pageant, Perez Hilton asked Carrie Prejean — the fugly air-headed bigot from San Diego — about same-sex marriage rights.
Ha-ha, Carrie didn’t win.
At the Miss USA pageant, Perez Hilton asked Carrie Prejean — the fugly air-headed bigot from San Diego — about same-sex marriage rights.
Ha-ha, Carrie didn’t win.
Well, this is another reason I was glad I watched “Desperate Housewives” instead of the pageant.
My guess is her answer cost her the title and crown.
I’m sure the majority of the judges wanted to “Cut a Bitch” (thanks Kathy Griffin) and scored her pretty low.
I don’t think it’s fair to “cut da bitch”. Not everyone is gonna agree on this issue. She told the truth and she has the right to her opinion. She chooses to oppose same sex marriage. So I guess we need to oppose doing her hair, her make up, her wardrobe or any lame ass thing it takes to be a beauty queen b/c you know there is a gay person involved in all this bigoted beauty. I would love to see how she looks today. Hopefully a hot mess.
Yeah but those queens LOVE them some pageant life and give up their whole being just to be involved. Don’t you watch Little Miss Perfect?? Now them’s some peeps we lost to the dark side.
As for Miss California, well, perhaps she was raised that way but clearly her pageant mentor didn’t teach her to do anything to win the title. So is that good or bad? In a weird way, I kind of admire her guts but in a personal way I’m disappointed.
Pageants are so 70s. How is it they keep going?
She was 2nd in swimsuit and 3rd in gown going into Q&A, so I doubt her question would have brought her into first place if she answered it differently…
“the fugly air-headed bigot from San Diego”
Miss Prejean answered her question with dignity and grace, and was honest and respectful in portraying her opinion.
That is far better than what the author of this post did, instead resorting to derogatory name calling. Someone must have been looking in the mirror when writing this post.
Sometimes gay people embarrass me.
I think it’s better to lose for being honest than to win for lying. I doubt she thought her answer would play well with the people in the pageant business, so “good” for her.
That said, she could’ve answered the question WAY more intelligently than she did (“we can choose gay marriage or opposite marriage”? Brilliant). Why not say: “I personally believe in traditional marriage, but happy that same-sex couples are beginning to obtain equal rights in this country.” I would think that’s a smart, respectable answer.
I am thrilled to be in California which is a country that allows opposites to marry opposties as well as non opposites to marry. Like Mz. California, I believe that it is better for non opposite marriage to marry other non opposites, and I hope I don’t offend anyone by this, but opposites that are not a man or woman opposite marriages should refrain from being the same.
I hope I have made myself clear. We can not support non opposite marriage even if my sister is a blg ass closet case in the Marines.
Like, such as, the Iraq…
I am going to start using “opposite marriage”. Love it.
Yes, like such as the Iraq….and all, and such as furthermore.
Any moron would have mentioned states rights as well as their beliefs like an ‘in my opinion’ but adding that every state has the right to vote about it and how great our country is for allowing us the right to vote. and like such as some places dont have maps like such as the iraq and the south africa such as.
I applaud her.
Yes, I’m not one of your readers.
Marriage is a faith-based issue, not a legal one.
Yes, people have been forbidden from marrying, by the state AND by the church. But the state only has jurisdiction over Civil Unions, not Marriages.
If the state does it, it’s a legal issue. If you want the same rights to have a ‘Civil Union’, I have no issue.
But, if you want to legislate whether a church will have to grant a ‘Marriage’ to people it does not accept willingly as individuals, then you’re misguided about whether you truly wish to ‘belong’ to that entity in the first place.
I have my faith, as does anyone of faith – atheists and agnostics notwithstanding.
The the difference is that I am willing to play by “the rules” of my faith, and not attempt to usurp it on a legal platform for my own convenience.
To paraphrase Lincoln: Everyone prays that God is on their side; I simply pray that I am on God’s.
And if that means that people of the same sex are able to have Civil Unions, but not ordained Marriages, then so be it!
Actually it’s Queen Perez that sucks the big one. Get over it – what Carrie did was voicing her beliefs that match more than 90% of Americans. You’re the minority, not Carrie. Faggots.
So what does Perez do????
He rails against intolerence by being intolerant about differing opinions.
What a petty little man he is. You may not like what she stands for, but at least she it true to her beliefs. Better than that hypocrit Perez
“the fugly air-headed bigot from San Diego ”
Hilton is from San Diego?
What amazes me is the fact the homosexual community DEMANDS that everyone be tolerant of their way of thinking. But they are not tolerant of what others think.
If he didn’t want an honest answer he shouldn’t have asked the question. This is the problem, you (gays) preach tolerance, but when it comes to disagreeing with the gays there is none. You either agree with them or your wrong and bigot! I myself am very proud of her for sticking to her guns.
Tolerence. Does that mean only if you agree with me? That’s what perez thinks. To bad he is so intolerant and insecure.
Such a witty article. It’s what I have come to expect from this tolerant group.
First off, I agree completely with C. Gifford and Mark. The militant attitude from some gays is something I simply don’t understand. They want tolerance and acceptance, yet if you dare disagree you get a blast of degrading BS (i.e. Perez’s blogs post-pagent). One cannot demand acceptance- you will never get it that way. I also have a HUGE problem with a big, fat flamboyant queen posing this question in the first place. The pagent itself bears some responsibility in this regard. It was a “set-up”, leading to only one “correct” answer. When she didn’t give the prescribed response, she was attacked. She said nothing that any reasonable person (straight or gay) could have possibly found offensive. The crap Perez said about her on his website were far, far worse than anything she said. The whole thing is stupid in my opinion. I can’t wait for the entire PC movement to blow over. If what I say offends you, tough crap- deal with it, sissy.
Hey, so she is bigoted for her view ? I guess so is President Obama and a host of other progressives who share her opinion. As a Conservative, I am for state’s rights on this issue, whichever way the ball bounces.
The Queer Nation has voted. Hating women is the norm for gay men. Hating absolutely gorgeous women…what they themselves long to become and can’t…brings out the venom and the bile. This woman is NOT bigoted. The Queer Nation is…as they are INTOLERANT, disrespectful, and hateful…the very characteristics they lobby against, the same characteristics they endow others with even though the others don’t share these characteristics and they, the Queer Nation do.
PJ O’Rourke summed it up tbest:
The principle feature of American liberalism is sanctimoniousness. By loudly denouncing all bad things – war and hunger and date rape – liberals testify to their own terrific goodness. More importantly, they promote themselves to membership in a self-selecting elite of those who care deeply about such things… It’s a kind of natural aristocracy, and the wonderful thing about this aristocracy is that you don’t have to be brave, smart, strong or even lucky to join it, you just have to be liberal.
At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child – miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.
— PJ O’Rourke, 1991 from Parliament of Whores
Yeah! That woman! And her, beliefs!
You know, isn’t it the homosexuals who are always telling us to be more tolerant?
But, they hate when someone says they are against homosexual marriage which is, if I recall, having a different belief? Something to be tolerated, perhaps? Naw. Forget it. Let’s just attack her.